People of Kashmir have become aliens in their own homeland (Apne hi mulk my paraye) Kashmir, as a geographical entity and along with its people, has since 1948 been controlled by both India and Pakistan. One part is known to the people of Pakistan and Kashmiras “Azad Kashmir” while the Indian government refers to it as “Pakistan Occupied Kashmir”. The other part is under the control of India and Pakistan quite understandably calls it “Indian Occupied Kashmir”. Both, however, prefer using the word ‘administered’ for their respective controlled regions. The grand narrative of Kashmir politics in the subcontinent has been divided into two concepts i.e., Pakistan recognizes Kashmir as itsjugular vein (sheh-rag) and India as its integral part (atoot ang). But in between there are several questions that has haunted the region for decades: like, what is Kashmir problem? Why democracy has suffered in Kashmir? Why its people are protesting even after 68 years of partition?
Why the harsh laws like TADA,PSA,DAA,AFSPA, etc.were implemented in the state? Why people were and are being ruthlessly tortured and killed? Why
India and Pakistan fought wars with each other? And one of the most important questions is why the people of Kashmir feel alienated from rest of India especially after 1990s? There are many other questions but if we focus on the above mentioned questions and try to find answers by intellectual means, and head towards the solution, all the other big orsmall questions will vanish and peace can prevail in Jammu &Kashmir and, of course, in the two countries. Kashmir problem Kashmir problem is whatformer Indian home minister P. Chidambaram once said: “It’s all about broken promises which New Delhi from time to time had made with Kashmiri’s.” The statement has logical power to understand the problem of Kashmir conflict. Clearly, the accession of Kashmir to India had been an issue as early as the time of independence and partition. As Alastair Lamb records, included in the instrument of accession itself was a special clause requiring plebiscite to determine the wishes of the people once law and order had been re-established. (Alastair Lamb, Kashmir A Disputed Legacy1846-1990, chapter VI) Unlike other princely states, Kashmir had acceded to India conditionally and that conditional integration was accepted by India’s post-independence leadership. So there seems to be no other choice for the leadership in Delhi but to come to terms with the historical legacy of Kashmir conflict. Yet they have for decades overruled that choice and instead preferred to experiment with their own versions of what they call a ‘solution’ but to no avail. Denial of Democracy Elections are one of the
important tools used as a measuring scale for democracy or representative government and its success. No doubt elections have been conducted in Stateof Jammu and Kashmir from 1951 but the “nature of elections has always been doubtful because for Indian establishment national interest becomes more important than democracy.” (Balraj Puri,Kashmir Insurgency and After,p. 49) In 1951 the State constituent assembly elections were held and National Conference won all the 75 seats Other than the National Conference politicians nobody even dared to file nomination papers in the Valley. We
witnessed the same in 1957 and 1967 state assembly elections. In 1987,the State assembly elections were entirely unfair and rigged, which is no secret, and it affected the democratic culture of the State.
As the Central Government rules over the State without any check and balance, in the absence of democratic structure “the discontent of people showed the first
seeds of secession.”(Balraj Puri,Kashmir Insurgency and After, p. 48) So, there have been little efforts to make J&K a part of Indian democracy. Even the leaders of the pre-1947 Jammu and Kashmir freedom struggle wereinspired by the Indian National leaders during the freedom movement. But post-independence leadership of India did not make any attempt to support the idea of democracy in Kashmir. Need of the hour is to give democracy a chance in Kashmir in real context over national interest. Post 1990s civil protests and human rights violations During early 1990s the people of the State came out to protest against the regime peacefully but the nature and behavior of the state was too brutal that it killed hundreds of civilians which lead to the deep alienation of Kashmiris from the rest of India.
Denial of such rights as civil liberties, fair trial, peaceful demonstration, freedom of press and speech, exercising of torture, disappearances, sexual assault on women and excessive force used by Indian security agencies led to the breakdown of democratic principles and people of Kashmir became aliens in their own land. It’s a matter of great concern
that the India forces have been given a free hand to kill any person they choose.
The killing of innocent civilians in 2008 Amarnath Land Row agitation and Kashmir Unrest 2010 in which more than 130 civilians were killed, changed the face of Kashmir politics. Even New Delhi took some measures to stop the protests and it succeeded largely. A mission was started by the UPA Government to have a dialogue with all the stakeholders,including Hurriyat, and the team of expert interlocutors was sent to Kashmir with Dilip Padgonkar as the head. The interlocutors worked very hard to find a solution and prepared a comprehensive report which they submitted to the then home ministry of India headed by P. Chidambaram. But alas! Indian government did not step forward to fulfill any of the recommendations which led to a further deterioration of the already-worsened situation. People lost faith in the process of so-called “dialogue”. The execution of Afzal Guru in Tihar and the subsequent emergence of Burhan Wani as a new face of militancy in the age of globalization was a challenge to the Indian democracy. Hailed as a hero among a sizeable section of the local youth, his rise motivated people to join militant movement again, especially the educated youth who could havebetter future tomorrow.This was reported even by the State government. The present 2016 unrest after the killing of Burhan Wani has led to the killing of more than 90 innocent civilians. Hundreds have been blinded and
thousands have been injured so far. It’s not a new phenomenon but it is in facta deep sentiment among Kashmiris from1947 which burst up during 1990s in the name of militancy and is still going on. Tail piece:
A lasting solution to Kashmir will only be possible if India and Pakistan are willing to be flexible on their respective positions. Compromise is the only way to deal with the Kashmir Problem. At the end of the day it is the ground situation inside Kashmir that has pivotal importance and New Delhi
has to recognize it because if the Indian state keeps on attempting to crush the upsurge in Kashmir and the aspiration of people by force, it will have to pay the price, the most important of which may be the erosion of its democratic and secular character.
Author is Pursuing Doctors Degree in Political science in Aligarh Muslim University